Part Three- Strategies 8-12
Part three in EPL is geared toward
Small-Group Coaching toward the Common Core and explores four (of the five)
coaching strategies coaches can use with small groups of teachers. Here,
grade-level teams are coached and asked to develop implementation guides which
will be used to determine what should be taught, what materials should be used
during certain lessons, what should be expected from their students in order to
they may address the learning objectives of the Common Core Standards in both
their weekly and monthly instructional plans. It is important to note that
teachers must collaborate with each other to create this guideline and as a
result they must be patient, a great listener, is able to provide and take
feedback and most of all a team player. As a coach it is your duty to guide
these teachers through the entire process. It may take more than one try but
when they have the idea of what to do, then they are able to work on their own
when it comes to implementing other standards. On page 92 an example of what an
implementation guide for a grade one class was made/shared.
Have you ever made an implementation guideline with
your grade-level colleagues? How was the process and what did you learn from
the experience? If not, what type of grade-level teamwork have you been involved
in?
Looking at strategy 9 and 10,
it is evident that they can go hand in hand as they focus on student
assessments for planning instruction as well as using them to reflect on
instruction. Strategy 9, which talks about reviewing assessment data for plan
instruction and strategy 10, which discusses examining student work are important
traits effective teachers should possess. As indicated in our text, the process
of reviewing assessment is becoming more and more complex and challenging for
teachers, especially because they have to focus on teaching with the standards
in mind. However, when literacy coaches are a part of these teams, whether data
or grade-level, they are able to provide support for the teachers as they learn
to use the data for planning and reflection.
When examining student work
(for reflection), teachers may grade it or collect data for themselves to help
with future instruction. As indicated in our text, in order for students to be
successful after collecting the data, teachers must work together within or
across grade-levels to become more aware of their students’ work, thus making
their instruction better.
The text shares some reasons
why teachers examine students’ work (p. 104). How often do you intensely examine student work and do you have a form to
follow (p. 108) that was provided by your team? Why do you examine students’
work and how does it assist you for future instruction?
The last two strategies (11
and 12) focus on reviewing units of study and the implementing of a lesson
study respectively. Reviewing a unit allows teachers to see how well their
students have done as it relates to meeting the learning standards of that
unit. In addition, when they have conducted a review, teachers are also able to
see what changes need to be made, if any, to better their future lessons. When
this review is done collaboratively, improvements can be made across grade-levels
in teaching and learning. Last, when conducting a lesson study in a small group,
teachers work together to not only examine instructional practices but also
student achievements as it relates to the standards.
Have you ever been a part of a lesson study? What do
you think about the four phases and as a literacy coach what do you think your
job will look like during this time?
Part Five- Profile 1-6
In part five, we get an in-depth
look into six profiles as it relates to some challenges literacy coaches may experience.
The include, establishing and maintaining administrator support, getting into
the classroom, working with hesitant teachers, staying the course, embedding coaching
into other assigned duties and organizing for success. Each section provides
useful tips and resources that can assist you in combating the challenges
mentioned above as it relates to literacy coaching. On pages 197 and 198 in
particular, I really appreciated the ideas shared in figure 1. and form 1 respectively.
This goes back to last weeks’ discussion about pre-made charts and how they can
be very useful to busy teachers. As a new literacy coach these two forms will
be of great assistance as you try to show your support to all teachers. The
charts on page 206 also present some very useful information as you try to
embed coaching into other duties.
As a literacy coach which profile(s) do you think you
will need keep close by because you are experiencing or will experience these challenges
the most, and why?
As we continue to work on
our PD plans please elaborate on how far you have come and what questions you
may have. I am still in the beginning stages of creating my PD plan but hope to
have a draft for you all soon (I think we said by Thursday right). As an
alternative for my coaching practice, I had to create a few scripts and videos
about coaching. I have worked really hard on these and the final product will
be shared soon. I won’t say either of them were hard to complete but I will say
that the work of preparing the scripts and videos were tedious and for the PD
plan I just wanted to make sure everything was cohesive and appropriate so maybe that’s why it took me a bit longer to complete it.
Which activity do you plan to go in detail with and
how does it relate to your grant proposal?
The implementation guide isn’t something I have created or collaborated with other on. I appreciate the tangible steps the guide provides to aid in PD creation. I plan to use some of these in my PD plan. I like the idea of using essential questions to help focus learning. As a grade level I have participated in group planning and data assessment. We have also focused on the instructional resources more than the elements needing to be addressed with a particular standard in mind. Also, I have work in vertical collaboration with a team to create a curriculum map to help guide instruction based on a timeline that corresponded with the quarters and semesters in school.
ReplyDeleteAs teachers we continually examine student work; however, we rarely do this as a grade level team at my school. I can see how this practice could be beneficial for a variety of reasons. I think it allows teachers to see how students from other classes are performing in light of their own students. Additionally, I think this allows the grade level team to have a more equitable understanding of the expectations they ought to have based on the current standards. This leads to the development of useful rubrics that correspond with authentic assessments. This type of purposeful examination allows us to create a plan of instruction that is based on standards and very purposeful.
I haven’t had the opportunity to participate in a lesson study. I think that it would be interesting though and could prove very beneficial. I feel like this type of lesson study could become expensive when finding substitutes is part of the equation. Also, there is a significant time commitment with this type of PD. The four phases seem fairly logical. I think in Phase 1 the literacy coach's job would be to facilitate discussion within the members of the PLC team. The coach needs to listen to the team members and discuss concerns and ensure that the needs that are addressed by the lesson study both line up with standards and the desires of those who are in the PLC. Phase 2 seems to also be a phase in which the literacy leader takes on the role of a facilitator. He/she could provide the team with tools to assist in the lesson development and data collection. When it comes to phase three, I think the literacy coach or another literacy leader in the school could conduct the research lesson while the others take part in data collection. Lastly, I think phase four needs to occur both in groups and individually. Sometimes sharing thoughts and ideas can be great, and sometimes personal reflection needs to occur to ensure critical thinking.
The profile that I found I like the best is Profile 6: “Organizing for Success”. All of the profiles have some critical pieces that are beneficial. This just stood out to me because I know that as a reacher, your ability to stay organized can affect how much kids can learn. I feel like this applies to coaching. Being organized is essential. I don’t feel like this has to be a natural process for Literacy Coaches. I do feel like it needs to be learned and practiced. The pointers they give on page 109 are really helpful if applied. Also, some of these organizational practices could be done by people helping the reading specialist so that a bunch of time isn’t spent in organization but in the coaching process.
In regards to my PD plan, I want to focus on the use of technology and literacy within the school. This was a topic of interest to many of the teachers in the building. I can up with three main focus areas within the topic to be explored by faculty. Concerning my grant, I hope to develop one that provides the class with more IPADS for use in the classroom. My eventual goal would be to have a one-to-one classroom!
I agree with you Cathy when you aid that examining students work allows teachers to see how students from other classes are performing in light of their own students. And like you said, it also helps teachers in creating future tests and class instruction. Test results tell teachers when to move on or slow down. Although I never participated in grade- level collaboration (my school only had one of each grade level) I took my students assessment very seriously. I always compared results from previous tests to help me understand areas that needed to improve or chance.
DeleteCathy,
DeleteI feel like curriculum maps and essential questions go hand in hand. I also have worked on a curriculum map with my former kindergarten team and I think it helped make instruction purposeful.
I agree with you that organization is an important part of not only being a literacy coach but just a leader of others in general. I also liked the pointers in Figure 1. I could use some of this in my personal life!
Cathy,
ReplyDeleteI like what you said at the end of your third paragraph about personal reflection and how it needs to occur to ensure critical thinking. I couldn’t agree more. As coaches and teachers this is important for our growth both inside and outside the classroom as well as for our sanity. Reflection allows for time to put things into perspective, to question and to check or write new goals, among other things. I believe that educators should be reminded that they need to engage in personal reflection because, honestly, I think they forget about it. Maybe this can be a PD where teachers are given tips on how and where they could exercise introspection and the benefits it can have both personally and professionally.
It would be really interesting to come up with ways to help teachers be reflective on a daily basis through the use of tools (graphic organizers, etc.) that help teachers move from thought to action.
DeleteThat is a really good idea Cathy. I am a visual person and a graphic organizer would would perfectly for me!
DeleteI preach using graphic organizers with my students all the time. I think it is only fair that I would also preach it to adults or even myself as well.
DeleteLadies, We will talk about your activities in class on Friday...bring ideas. SB
ReplyDeleteHave you ever made an implementation guideline with your grade-level colleagues? How was the process and what did you learn from the experience? If not, what type of grade-level teamwork have you been involved in?
ReplyDeleteI have never made an implementation guideline, or have never even collaborated with my grade-level colleagues, this is due to my lack of time in the classroom. However, I think grade-level collaboration is a great idea and I wish to implement it more into the education system when I return.
How often do you intensely examine student work and do you have a form to follow (p. 108) that was provided by your team? Why do you examine students’ work and how does it assist you for future instruction?
Again, I have never worked with a team regarding student assessment. However, assessment was a big part of my routine because it helped me to understand where my students where and where I could help them be.
Have you ever been a part of a lesson study? What do you think about the four phases and as a literacy coach what do you think your job will look like during this time?
I have never participated in a lesson study either but the four phase plan seems very easy to follow and implement. However, knowing that this will be done during school time, like Cathy said it can prove to be very expensive having to bring in substitutes. Phase one, I think it is always a good idea to have a refresher meeting on the standards to be used. They prove to be the guide for everything teaching related. The other phases are sequenced appropriately. The goal for each phase reminds me of the coaching cycle where the coach and the teachers are working closely together. As a coach it would be my responsibility to help teachers develop and solidify their ideas. Making sure they understand what they have to do through the lesson plan and collection of data is very important in achieving great results.
As a literacy coach which profile(s) do you think you will need keep close by because you are experiencing or will experience these challenges the most, and why?
I think I would need to keep profile one (establishing and maintaining administrator support) close by. Yes, I do believe that all teachers hold some level of responsibility in the school but now we know that literacy coachers hold just a little (or a lot) more responsibility which they have to live up to. With that said, as a new literacy coach, having to work with other individuals with such authority, such as the principal can be a little intimidating for me. This profile will remind me that I am just as important and it is important to make sure relationships are built whereby I am able to provide my professional input.
Krystal,
DeleteI agree that assessments help you know where students are academically. I think that assessment should drive instruction in the sense that instruction needs to build on the student's knowledge (scaffolding).
Also, having administrator support is important. In some districts the Reading Specialist or coach is considered a part of administration.
Krystal,
DeleteI do think that having administrative support helps so much. It is always a positive when the boss is on your side and supports you. i liked Figure 2 and ways you can establish a good relationship with your principal.
Krystal,
DeleteJust like the others I too agree that assessments help us as educators to know where are students are. Assessments, especially those made by the teacher are important because they help to see growth.
I have made a variation of this implementation guideline shown on page 92. My school is an A+ school which focuses on integrating the curriculum using essential questions which are overarching questions that teachers use to focus their instruction. It is a lot like this process that is shown in the text. I really enjoy being an A+ school and would suggest getting some professional development for it! I think the process really helped me be more intentional about my teaching and figure out what it is that I wanted my students to get from each lesson. Before teaching a lesson I always try to ask myself “What do I want my students to get from this lesson? What do I want them to learn?”. I think reflecting on that is a big part of being a good educator and I think that helping other teachers make these kind of connections is important as well.
ReplyDeleteI assess student work quite often to look for patterns, successes and areas of improvement. I have mentally thought of those questions in Figure 10.2 but have never really written my thoughts down on paper. In kindergarten it was a lot of informal assessments through observation. I have not really used a specific form or format that helps me assess student work. I think it would be nice to come up with some sort of form to follow. I think it would be great to have a school wide student work form that could be modified for each grade level. I appreciated forms 10.1-10.2 that were provided in the text.
Now that I know what a lesson study looks like, I have participated in a lesson study however it was never as formal as the text described and the teacher who taught the lesson was not from our team. The Oklahoma Writing Project came to our school to conduct a lesson study by teaching a writing lesson to our grade level. It was really neat to observe another teacher teach because after college you don’t get to experience very much of that. During this process we also talked about the standard that was going to be taught, the OWP teacher taught the lesson while the grade level teachers watched and took notes and then we all met to debrief about the lesson. It was a really great experience! I think if I were a literacy coach conducting this type of PD I can see that I would help facilitate the process of guiding the teachers as well as conducting the lesson for the grade level teachers to watch.
I really appreciated Part Five and how useful it all was. I really feel like as a literacy coach, one would experience all of these at some point or another. Profile 3 really resonated with me because it focused on working with hesitant or resisting teachers. I think that is the scariest part about leading teachers. Working with other teachers who don’t respond well to coaching is hard! I liked that this chapter laid out responses to teacher statements that are hesitant. I think this will help lead me in the right direction when working with teachers who are hesitant.
In regards to my PD plan, I am wanting to focus on providing opportunities for vertical alignment within my building. This might be as simple as getting enough funding to supply substitutes in the building so that different grade levels can meet during school hours. I am not sure how to go about this but hopefully there is a way to get this started.
I agree that some type of rubric to evaluate student work and establish norms would prove beneficial. I think it is really important that each school create these rubrics. I think this is a part of the constructivist acquisition of knowledge. I had no idea that the Oklahoma Writing Project came into schools and worked with teachers. What a great opportunity for teachers. This seems like a great way to spend time in PD. It seems that they would have a lot to offer given the ever increasing way in which writing is interwoven throughout the curriculum.
ReplyDeleteKatheryn,
ReplyDeleteI too ask myself questions about what I want my students to get from a lesson and like you said doing this is being a good educator. You also said that you look at your students’ work quite often and I would like to know if you also keep notes about what you have found and what do you do with them? Do you change different parts of your lesson to help your students, if they are struggling or otherwise?